Sustainable Solutions For the Humanitarian Crisis in Southern
Sudan
Dada Shantimaya is the agricultural coordinator of the Ananda
Marga Universal Relief Team (AMURT) in Southern Sudan.
After six months in the field, he spoke to New Renaissance
about the relief and development work which is being conducted in this
war-torn and famine-stricken region.
NR:
Why is Southern Sudan considered to be a humanitarian crisis
area?
DS:
South Sudan has become a priority for the UN, UNICEF and other relief
agencies. There are many countries in Africa, which are fragmented
into numerous tribes. However in Sudan there is clear division between
the people of the South who consider themselves to be African and
Christian, and those of the North, who are Muslim. And this is the
reason why the country has experienced so much turmoil in last 16
years.
NR:
What is the reason for the famine conditions of this region?
DS:
The main split between the North and the South took place in 1983.
Sixteen years of fighting have devastated Sudan.
The country was not rich, though the south is considered to be
potentially rich. It is
very fertile and rich in minerals. We are talking about tribal people
who had very little for
their survival and then found themselves in a war lasting almost two
decades.
In
1998 a number of things came together and created extreme difficulties
for certain areas of South Sudan.
Basically in almost every year of the past decade they were
faced with a "hunger gap" in the months of January-August
(in some areas it goes from March to August). This is the period when
the previous crop finishes and the new one has not come in.
In 1998 this became a catastrophe due to no rain in March until
the beginning of August, the rain came late and devastated their
cultivation. When the
rain came it came in such an abundant pattern that it flooded areas
and most of the crops were wiped out.
The hunger gap which was supposed to end in August 1998, was
extended right to the present moment..
NR:
How many people are affected by this catastrophe?
DS:
If we look at the region wise statistics, we see a lot of
internally displaced people in the Bahar al Gazal area where we are
working. We are talking about 200,000 in this region wandering around
looking for food and they are putting a lot of strain on the small
feeding centres started by the non governmental organizations (NGOs)
creating more instability in these areas.
NR:
Can you describe how the civil war is being conducted and what effect
it has on the people?
DS:
Recently one of the south Sudan rebel leaders defected to the
government and turned on the local population, burning houses and
destroying crops. This was a big blow to the southern Sudanese and
created much psychological instability. Usually the forces of the
government move in the dry season with horses and attack settlements
in Southern Sudan. The Popular Defense Force (a government
agency) made a shocking attack in February of 1999.
They raided and took a bounty of 700 people who forced into
slavery. Usually they take women and children and the men are killed.
On this particular raid they took 700 people, 2000 cattle, and
killed 70. During war, men die, and in Sudan this causes a
particularly serious problem. Men marry and usually have 10 wives (and
around each wife there is household). When one man dies there are 10
family units or households affected causing a very bad condition for
women and children.
NR:
What are the relief agencies doing to help the people of this region?
DS:
Around 1993-1994 people around the world began to have awareness of
this crisis and that is when the Operation Lifeline Sudan (OLS) was
started. OLS is a consortium of different agencies.
OLS works under the auspices of the UN. Members include UNICEF,
the World Food Program (WFP) and then there are many NGOs such as
Care, Save the Children, and others. They started as a relief
operation in 1993 and 1994, and they were hoping to solve the problem
in a short time.
But
they eventually changed from relief to long-term sustainable programs
in education, agriculture, income generation, water facilities, dam
building, hygiene and health centers. The whole emphasis shifted from
relief to development.
The
logistical problem has made the whole operation very difficult. They
have to fly into South
Sudan 1000km from the supply camp on the Kenya border. All relief
materials have to be flown in. There are no secure land routes.
The cost of the food and relief materials is then multiplied
3-5 times due to the high cost of transport.
NR:
How much has been spent on Sudan?
DS:
It is a million $ per day operation, going on for the last six
years, that is why this is considered a complex operation even for the
largest NGOS and relief organizations. This is an operation that is
still struggling to bring the minimum necessities of survival to the
people.
NR: How is AMURT working to create sustainable solutions to the
problems of the area?
DS:
AMURT started in August 1998 at what was supposed to be the end
of the hunger-gap period. We made an assessment trip to the Bahar al
Gazal area. A second assessment team went in October 1998 and the
actual establishment of the permanent camp was in 2 December.
It is in an area bordering the government-controlled area and
considered to be one of the most vulnerable and unstable areas.
Originally
we discussed an education program, similar to what we have done in
other parts of Africa. But
we made it a bit innovative. Not only did we want to support schools
with the material supplies, but we also introduced a sustainable
approach to education. The schools should be able to stand on their
own. This proved to be something interesting and well suited to the
mentality of the local
people. They had a custom that each family would contribute to a
teacher's upkeep. So they welcomed the chance to work as a community.
We spoke to them about how to support the teachers and
children. The community
decided that they would like to cultivate land, and that this would be
a project for the school. It
would be what UNICEF and OLS calls a “School Garden”.
This is a development program, not a relief program where food
is just given.
NR:
Can you say something about the conditions of the schools and gardens?
DS:
We now have 52 schools under our care.
Very few have premises, some are in mud houses and some are
bush schools, which are under trees. We are responsible for 6000
children. It is a primary
education from grades 1-7. Our
next phase is to develop boarding schools. Presently some students
have to walk 4-10 hours to reach the school. We cultivate 143 acres of
land to support these schools. We
work in a single county. School gardens and farms have vegetables
(many of which are new to the area)---they grow cucumber, egg plants,
pumpkins, French beans, and onions . One of the first experimental
vegetable gardens which we started uses local irrigation technologies.
It was a known technology but was not widely used in this area.
It is called a "shadoop" which is a system for lifting water
from a source to 2.5 meters above and then into a channel which goes
to different seed beds. We
started harvesting after 2.5 months, and the vegetables are doing
well.
NR:
What do you see as the future of Southern Sudan?
DS:
Sudan
is a country of contrasts. Some people live with nothing, yet there
are community values, culture and roots and they have their own
identity, which cannot be denied. We are facing an exhausted
community—physically, psychologically and they are not able to cope
with such a threatening reality.
But they are determined to find a solution.
The international community has not put much energy into
helping to resolve the problem in a political way.
There have been some meetings and a ceasefire.
The conflict does not seem ready to end very soon.
But even if the war ends, we are with a community which is
fighting for its survival due to a harsh climate and difficult
conditions--they still have a long way to go to create a decent living
condition.
If
you would like to learn
more about the work of
AMURT in Southern Sudan visit their web
page located at http://www.amurt.net/sudan
This article was published in New Renaissance,
Volume 9, No. 1, issue 27 and this page was posted on the web
on August 18, 1999
|