The Common Vision: Parenting
and Educating for Wholeness
by David Marshak
Peter Lang, New York, 1997
Counterpoints Vol.48
reviewed by Dr. Margaret Rathwell
The Counterpoint
series seeks to break new ground by bringing innovative and imaginative books in
education to a wide audience, avoiding difficult theoretical discourses. This is
fulfilled by David Marshak’s balanced, easy-to-read book The Common Vision:
Parenting and Educating for Wholeness. Marshak looks at how three early
twentieth-century spiritual teachers—Rudolf Steiner, Sri Aurobindo and Hazrat
Inayat Khan—understood the nature and importance of the human spirit in their
educational philosophies and practice.
Marshak
describes how child raising and educational practice are a means for the human
species to evolve morally and spiritually in order to surpass the current
ecological and human crises. A joint growth of adults and children, what he
calls a ‘conscious co-evolution,’ is required. As we parents and teachers
unfold as whole beings, the more nurturance and aid we can give our children.
For each
teaching there is a chapter on the theoretical visions of the propounder and
then a chapter on the practical implementation. Despite their different cultural
backgrounds (Steiner: Germanic, Sri Aurobindo: Hindu and Hazrat Inayat Khan:
Muslim) they have what Marshak calls a ‘common vision’ of human nature and
human development up to the age twenty-one. It is holistic and integrative.
Although there are differences, they are also similar. Each describes
interacting planes of existence from the physical being to the subtler
life-force plane, then the higher mental plane and lastly the plane of the
spirit which is the true self within us. Education should consider all these
layers, not just the physical and intellectual layers of traditional education.
Chapter 4
describes a day in the life of the second grade at the Waldorf School in
Lexington, Massachusetts. He brings to life features of Steiner’s approach,
such as the insight of the teacher, the rhythm of the day, the aesthetic and
artistic core of activity, the focus on stories and the holistic approach to
memory. Chapter 6 describes the Aurobindo International Centre of Education at
Pondicherry, India where a ‘free progress system’ tries to bring forth the
child’s inner teacher to help the child develop her/himself and find the true
inner being. Teachers help students to follow their interests and be
self-motivated. Chapter 8 shows the principles of the Sufi Seed Centre schools
in the U.S., following Khan’s teachings, which set up a controlled environment
and allow the child freedom within that environment to explore and discover
their own world.
Marshak gives
some interesting conclusions about their common vision. He sees that the
descriptions of human nature and the stages of the child’s unfoldment are
valid today and help us understand the child’s unfoldment in body, emotions,
mind and spirit. He reports that for all three, the most profound element for
child raising and education is the understanding that we must have faith in the
child’s ‘inner teacher’ to guide their development. He observes that
freedom and self-direction are not necessarily evident in their educational
practice. In Steiner schools the teacher organises both the learning environment
and much of the child’s activity within it. According to Aurobindo’s system,
the teacher acts not directly on the child but only on the environment. As the
school evolved the teacher became more active and directive with the child.
Marshak
concludes that the problem lies with attempts by limited, imperfect humans to
enact this idea: "We can only give the child as much respect for her inner
teacher, as much freedom for her becoming, as the state of our current
unfoldment empowers us. If we extend beyond that limit in our enthusiasm or
pride, we will inevitably betray the understandings of the common vision and act
out hypocrisy or contradiction, most likely through indirect or unconscious
authoritarian behaviour." A parent’s or teacher’s own spiritual
evolution empowers her/him to increase the child’s freedom. Just as we see
many examples of experienced and inspired teachers working well in traditional
schools, we also see many imperfect classes in alternative schools founded on
good ideals. Marshak believes that Steiner developed the Waldorf school as he
did because teachers in 1919 needed a teacher-centred pedagogy and a detailed
curriculum according to their unfoldment. At the Aurobindo school there was a
movement towards more teacher-direction as the teachers learned how much freedom
they could offer to students, given their own levels of unfoldment.
For me it is
also important that the philosophy behind an educational system is universal and
non-dogmatic, recognising the divinity in all. If the philosophy is flawed, then
eventually the teaching must be flawed. Marshak further comments that the free
school movement of the late 1960’s (Summerhill in the UK) tried to begin the
evolutionary process by giving freedom to high-school age youths; but this is
the wrong way to start. We must begin with young children who have never
experienced repressive, authoritarian, adult-centred schools. The young child is
so eager to learn yet often their enthusiasm is crushed by parents and teachers.
Montessori, in particular, stressed the importance of this first period of
development, with guidelines for the birth experience, and the education of
parents to help the unfolding of the child’s ‘spiritual embryo’ up to 3
years, when the child is supremely sensitive.
Since everything the child
experiences will have an impact, we must beware of the powerful influence of the
mass-media with the violence and materialism they project. Concentration,
contemplation and meditation greatly help children to develop control of their
awareness. These are introduced early in the Aurobindo and Sufi schools. Marshak
proposes these practices for existing schools. We must remember that it is
children who will change society; it is they who, if we are successful as
parents and teachers, have the potential to evolve beyond us.
|